Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail Road
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The plaintiffs have applied to this court for an order pendente lite enjoining each of the defendants from doing any acts or signing any documents, the effect of which will be to consummate the plan of merger between the defendant, The Rensselaer and Saratoga Rail Road Company and The Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corporation.
Upon the return of an order to show cause The Delaware and Hudson Company and The Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corporation have applied to this court to intervene and be made parties defendant in this action, and also to be heard in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kavanaugh v. . Kavanaugh Knitting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Colby v. Equitable Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Cleary v. HigleyNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Zobel v. American Locomotive Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- Wilson v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945