Legal Opinion

Asseff v. Kingsland, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 24, 1949No. 9731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia dismissing appellants’ complaint, brought under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 1 for authorization of a patent. The application was for an improved high pressure lubricating oil consisting of a hydrocarbon oil plus certain additives which latter curtail ring clogging and corrosion of pistons and bearings.

The Patent Office denied the application, on the ground that it lacked invention and was the result of a natural course of experimentation using the knowledge of prior patents. The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asseff v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Prutton v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Asseff v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Reichard v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API