Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shydler v. Shydler

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1998No. 25444Published

1DissentSpringer, C. J.

I would affirm the family court’s decree.

Alimony

My first disagreement with the majority opinion is its sending the case back to the trial court “to determine a fair award” of alimony. In my view, the trial court acted well within its discretionary powers in deciding that the husband should not be required to make post-divorce support payments. I think that the record supports this decision and that this court should not be “second-guessing” the trial court.

There is evidence to support the conclusion that the wife has a number of professional and occupational skills and that she has an earning…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hopper v. HopperNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. McDermott v. McDermottNevada Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API