Legal Opinion

State v. Collins

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1909No. 16,068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Finney district court; William H. Thompson, judge.

1Per curiam

Albert Collins appeals from a conviction on a charge of larceny. Complaint is made because *412the information described the stolen property as $110 in money, without attempting a further description or stating that the informant was unable to give one. Such an objection has been held to be good upon a motion to quash (The State v. Tilney, 38 Kan. 714, 17 Pac. 606), but not upon a motion in arrest of judgment (The State v. Henry, 24 Kan. 457). No motion to quash was filed in this case. Aside from a motion in arrest of judgment, the sufficiency of the information was challenged only by an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. State v. TilneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. City of Fort Scott v. DunkertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DixsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. State v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. State v. CallisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API