Wolf v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*478SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal from orders waiving juvenile jurisdiction as to appellants Wolf and Brooks, who are juveniles and accused of committing first degree murder. The effect of the waiver orders is that the State may prosecute the appellants as adults. We affirm.
One Enrico Flory was murdered on June 3,1976, at which time appellant Brooks was 17 years of age and appellant Wolf was 15 years of age. Appellants were charged with that murder. Petitions requesting the waiver of juvenile jurisdiction as to appellants in connection with these charges were filed on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. GibbsIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. LindquistIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- In re Ralph M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. MastracchioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- State v. BrooksIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.