Legal Opinion

Lampert v. Town of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 1, 1992No. 91-290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The Town of Hudson (town) appeals the Superior Court’s (Murphy, J.) grant of the plaintiffs’ motion for summary *197judgment. The superior court reversed a decision of the Hudson planning board (board). The board had approved the plaintiffs’ site plan subject to the condition that the plaintiffs pay a “corridor allocation procedure fee,” also known as an impact fee, designed to allocate the predicted expense of improvements and increased services resulting from the applicants’ development. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

The plaintiffs, Alan G. Lampert and Alan V. Ligouri,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Longridge Builders v. Planning Bd. of Princeton Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. In re DoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Land/Vest Properties, Inc. v. Town of PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. New England Brickmaster, Inc. v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Appeal of Hoyt Rental & Leasing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Water Commissioners v. MooneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API