Legal Opinion
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 9, 1958No. Civ. No. 9814PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
This action on three identical, unusual insurance policies is before the court on motions for judgment filed by plaintiffs and defendants respectively after a jury answered several questions of fact submitted to it but declared itself unable to agree on the answer to one of the questions.
Among other coverages, the policies insure against explosion, and against direct loss to electrical equipment or devices resulting from any artificial electrical disturbance immediately preceding and causing such explosion, provided the direct loss caused by electricity and ensuing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. GrannisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Bridal Veil Lumber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Hankins v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Empire State Insurance Co. of Watertown v. GuerrieroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Charles Dowd Box Company, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Louisville Gas and Electric Company v. The American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Baltimore Gas And Electric Company v. United States Fidelity And Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959