Ernst v. Ernst

During the ninety-day period after the service of the notice of entry of judgment on J. Ed. Ernst there was no service on his behalf of a proposed bill of exceptions as prescribed by sec. 270.47, Stats. Likewise, there was no application made on his behalf for an extension of said ninety-day period, if before the expiration thereof he had applied for such an extension under sec. 269.45 (1), Stats., which provides:

“The court or g judge may with or without notice, for cause shown by affidavit and upon just terms and before the time has expired, extend the time within which any act or proceeding…