Container Service Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Taxpayer, Container Service Company, seeks a reversal of the District Court’s dismissal of its tax refund suit. We affirm.
The facts are detailed in the District Court’s opinion. 345 F.Supp. 235 (S.D. Ohio 1972). In 1968 the taxpayer established a profit sharing plan for its salaried employees and claims that its contributions made to the profit-sharing trust were tax deductible under 26 U.S.C. § 404(a). Employer contributions to a profit-sharing trust are tax deductible only if the profit-sharing plan is qualified under 26 U.S.C. § 401(a).
The employee coverage requirements are set out in §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ed & Jim Fleitz, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Loevsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Cornell-Young Company v. United States of America, MacOn Prestressed Concrete Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- John Duguid & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1967
- CONTAINER SERVICE COMPANY v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pulver Roofing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Fujinon Optical, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
- E. F. Higgins & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Orthopaedic Associates, P. C. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
- E. F. Higgins & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.