RPC Corp. v. Cable Marine, Inc.

This case was appropriately Per Curiam Affirmed. However the dissent raises an interesting point which invites comment. The jury verdict, presumed correct in any event, is supported by the evidence. There is no “right” to have an interrogatory verdict. Thus affirmance is required by section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1983).

As we said in Walsh v. Diaz, 409 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982):

The defendant-appellants’ sole contention on appeal is that the lower court *496reversibly erred in declining to submit a special interrogatory to the jury as to whether the plaintiff met the statutory no-fault…