Legal Opinion

Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. Sadau

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Clay County Court; W. T. Allen, Judge. Action by Frank Sadau against the Fidelity Phenix Fire Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

Frank Sadau filed this suit in the county court of Clay county to recover from the defendant, the Fidelity Phenix Fire Insurance Company, for the loss of certain household goods destroyed by fire, alleged to be covered by the defendant’s policy, in the sum of |500. There was a jury trial resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

[1] There are a number of assignments, but we need only discuss one, which presents an error' going to the foundation of the action. A careful examination of the statement of facts discloses that the policy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bauman v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Joplin v. South Texas Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Motor Service Co. v. TeutonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  4. Peterson v. Graham-Brown Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API