Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Holcomb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1975No. 55048, (Calendar No. 3)Published

1DissentM. S. Coleman, J.

(dissent). Leave to appeal was granted to explore the right of a defendant to represent himself under the circumstances at bar.

After all persons necessary to the trial, including defendant’s attorney, were present and prepared to go forward, defendant asked the court first for another attorney and next asked to represent himself.

The circuit judge, who had previously observed *338defendant’s behavior, had in hand a relevant psychiatric report and had spoken with defendant on the trial date, followed prevailing law and American Bar Association standards in reaching his conclusion that defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API