Legal Opinion

State v. Aponte

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2001No. 99AP-695 and 99AP-696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deshler, Judge.

Pursuant to this court’s memorandum decision rendered June 13, 2000, sustaining the application of defendant, Osvaldo Aponte, for reopening of his appeal pursuant to App.R. 26(B), defendant-appellant appeals from judgments of conviction and sentence entered by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in case Nos. 95CR-2520 and 97CR-2388.

On April 27, 1995, defendant was indicted in case No. 95CR-2520 on one count of felonious assault, one count of having a weapon while under disability, and one count of failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer. The charges…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. PeterseimOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. HakeOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. State v. CraigOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API