Legal Opinion

Robinson & Co. v. Marr

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1913No. Gen. No. 17,387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas J. Windes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

July 14,1898, C. C. Binkley, for the use of Robinson & Company, appellant, a corporation, began a suit on a judgment against Andrew Marr and sued out a writ of attachment in aid, which on said date was served upon John Clay, Jr., Charles 0. Robinson and William H. Forrest, composing the firm of Clay, Robinson & Company, appellees, as garnishees. The death of C. C. Binkley was later suggested on the record and the suit thereafter proceeded in the name of the beneficial plaintiff, Robinson & Company. Two appeals have been prosecuted to the Appellate Court from judgments in favor of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Sarah v. ReadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Board of Directors of Chicago Theo. Seminary v. People ex rel. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Markley v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Brack v. BoydIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CheesemanUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Moser v. FeciuraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  3. Tabero v. SutkowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API