Legal Opinion

Mulroy v. Carey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1977PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice G. Robert Witmer at the Appellate Division (58 AD2d 207).

In affirming, no view is expressed whether in any or all circumstances the exercise of the executive power to supersede an elected District Attorney would be beyond judicial review or correction in a direct or collateral action or proceeding brought or defended by the county or the elected District Attorney involved.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mulroy v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MATTER OF JOHNSON v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In re CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. In re HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Johnson v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Supreme Court v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API