Legal Opinion

F. E. Grauwiller Transportation Co. v. The Scow Jeanne

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 26, 1956No. Nos. 212-214, Dockets 23827-23829PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In the sharp conflict of testimony which developed below, Judge Bruchhausen, who saw and heard the witnesses, makes clear that he believed Searfoss, president of libellant F. E. Grauwiller Transportation Co, Inc, the original owner of the Scow Jeanne — the casus belli here — and disbelieved Elliott, who was a volunteer seeking authorization for the repairs he was having made to the vessel after its wreck in New York bay in the November, 1953, storm. D.C.E.D.N.Y, 131 F.Supp. 630. These were rational and reasonable deductions, supported by the decided weight of the testimony, including that of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. F. E. Grauwiller Transportation Co. v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. F. E. Grauwiller Transportation Co., Inc., Libellant-Appellee v. The Scow Jeanne and Charles J. King, Rodermond Industries, Inc., Libellant-Cross-Appellant v. The Scow Jeanne and Charles J. King, Inc., and F. E. Grauwiller Transportation Co., Inc., Joseph P. Elliott, Libellant-Appellant v. The Scow Jeanne and F. E. Grauwiller Transportation Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API