Grober v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. C.J.W.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A complaint to establish the paternity of then ten-year old C.J.W. was filed against Marc Grober. Grober argues that the action was time barred. Because actions are tolled during a child’s minority, we hold that the action was timely filed. Grober also appeals the order requiring him to submit to blood testing, and the court’s retroactive application of a newly enacted statute. We hold that Grober’s due process rights were not violated, and that the court did not err in retroactively applying a procedural statute. Thus, we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
D.W.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Atcherian v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Sands Ex Rel. Sands v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Aleck v. Delvo Plastics, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.