Legal Opinion

Grober v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. C.J.W.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1998No. S-7353PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A complaint to establish the paternity of then ten-year old C.J.W. was filed against Marc Grober. Grober argues that the action was time barred. Because actions are tolled during a child’s minority, we hold that the action was timely filed. Grober also appeals the order requiring him to submit to blood testing, and the court’s retroactive application of a newly enacted statute. We hold that Grober’s due process rights were not violated, and that the court did not err in retroactively applying a procedural statute. Thus, we affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

D.W.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Atcherian v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Sands Ex Rel. Sands v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Aleck v. Delvo Plastics, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API