Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 12, 1998No. CR 98-1135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Eric Davis filed a motion for rule on the clerk on September 15, 1998. We denied the motion because appellant’s attorney, C. Richard Lippard, did not admit fault in failing to timely file the record. See Davis v. State, 334 Ark. 427, 975 S.W.2d 97 (1998) (per curiam). We indicated, however, that we would grant the motion if appellant’s attorney filed within thirty days a motion and affidavit accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the record. Appellant’s attorney has assumed full responsibility for the error in a second motion for rule on the clerk filed on October 28,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harkness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Slaughter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Hussey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API