Legal Opinion

Huffman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1987No. 1284S478PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

In this direct appeal, defendant’s issues include the contention that he was entitled to discharge pursuant to Criminal Rule 4(C) due to the State’s failure to bring him to trial within one year following his arrest.

Criminal Rule 4(C) provides:

No person shall be held on recognizance or otherwise to answer a criminal charge for a period in aggregate embracing more than one year from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge, whichever is later; except where a continuance was had on his motion, or the delay was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Utterback v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Dudley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Zehrlaut v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Gill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Morrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Everroad v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Young v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Frisbie v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API