Legal Opinion

In re Rollins Boot Shop

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 18, 1928No. 67PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, District Judge.

The partners, Rollins and Jordan, each, in their bankruptcy schedules, claimed a $1,600 homestead under the Georgia Constitution, to be set apart partly in specific personal property, and the remainder to be cash from the partnership stock of merchandise. The stock had been inventoried by the trustee at its cost price, amounting to about $5,800; this also being the value placed on it in the bankruptcy schedule. It was appraised for sale, however, at only $1,700. The trustee construed these claims for an exemption of cash as a consent by the bankrupt to the sale of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re RichardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1899
  2. In re Ansley Bros.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1907
  3. In re CrumDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1913
  4. In re MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roquemore v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. In re Aranoff & SonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1931
  3. Roquemore v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Roquemore v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API