Synovus Bank v. Griner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Branch, Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case, account holders at state-chartered, federally-insured banks, filed this action against the banks asserting that the overdraft fees the banks charged in connection with debit card transactions and ATM withdrawals violated Georgia’s usury laws. This appeal presents the question of whether the plaintiffs have pled sufficient facts to allow them to proceed to discovery on their *360claims, or whether the trial court erred in denying the banks’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bush v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Benedict v. State Farm Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Albany v. South Georgia Rails to Trails, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
- City of Albany v. South Georgia Rails to Trails, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
- Synovus Bank v. Thomas GrinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013