Allegheny County Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
I agree with the majority that, although the Commission has the statutory authority to allocate costs of maintenance or reconstruction of “Black’s Bridge” crossing, it can do so as to the Port Authority only if that body is concerned with the particular highway-rail crossing in issue. I further agree that the Authority is not at this moment a concerned party and thus reject, primarily because of the discretion given to the Authority to choose its routes, any theory that the Authority has assumed a type of transferee liability.
However, in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Allegheny County Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Allegheny County Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967