Legal Opinion

Hetland v. Magnum Petroleum

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1987No. 86-321PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Ronald S. Hetland appeals a Workers’ Compensation Court ruling that Hetland was not acting within the course and scope of his employment at the time of his automobile accident and therefore was not eligible for workers’ compensation benefits. The issue on appeal is whether there is substantial evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s ruling. We affirm.

In January 1982, Hetland was hired by Magnum Petroleum as a convenience store clerk in Anaconda, Montana. The store manager instructed Hetland that his duties included cleaning the store, stocking shelves, logging the gasoline and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steffes v. 93 Leasing Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Courser v. Darby School Dist. No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Griffin v. Industrial Accident FundMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hagerman v. Galen State HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Correa v. Rexroat TileMontana Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heath v. Montana Municipal Insurance AuthorityMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rochdale Insurance Company v. Skylar DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API