Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1955No. 10358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

This suit was brought by Lura Barbara Hollingsworth, appellant, against Sears, Roebuck and Company for damages resulting from fraudulent representations allegedly made by appellee’s employees by which she was induced to buy from it and use certain plastic bathroom tile.

Prior to a trial on the merits appellee moved the court to enter an order prohibiting appellant “from presenting her grounds for relief in this suit.”

The motion was made under Rule 202, 1 which provides, in part, that in taking the oral depositions of a party to a suit that if the witness (party) “fails to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte MallinkrodtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  2. Sayles v. Bradley & Metcalf Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. HollingsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. HollingsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API