Legal Opinion
Davis v. Rome Kraft Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 19, 1957No. 36820PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
It is the contention of the plaintiff that the only issue before this court is whether or not the petition is good as against a general demurrer filed by the three defendants. It will be noted that the petition alleges ownership and/or interest in the land or trees. The petition must be construed as a whole. See Pink v. A.A.A. Highway Express, Inc., 191 Ga. 502 (13 S. E. 2d 337). There are many other cases to the same effect. Counsel for the defendants quote Code (Ann.) § 105-1412, which reads as follows: “Every person, firm or corporation, who, without the written consent of the owner of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Allen v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. R.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Evans v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Land & Cattle Co. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Sohr v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Galt Automotive Properties, LLC v. Advesco, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020