Legal Opinion

State v. Gover

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1995No. 94-2067PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case presents the question of whether a defendant’s claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel due to a trial court’s failure to notify the attorney that he had been appointed to represent the defendant on appeal can be brought as a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel pursuant to the exception to R.C. 2953.21 articulated in State v. Murnahan, supra.

Gover’s five propositions of law can essentially be reduced to two: (1) the trial court’s failure to notify his appointed counsel of the appointment denied him his right to counsel on appeal under the Sixth and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CatlinoOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Chester T. Steed v. William D. Salisbury, Superintendent, Chillicothe Correctional InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. RandleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. ReyesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. Collins, 06ca40 (7-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. FutureOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API