Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Wilcox

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 23, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

" Probate of will.

1Opinion of the Court

Adlington, S.

—The question of the due execution of this will has been heretofore settled by the courts, and the only point now remaining to be determined arises out of certain alterations and erasures appearing on the face of the instrument. In two clauses of the will, in which legacies of $7,000 were given to the relatives of the testator, the letter “s” has been erased and the letters “el” substituted therefor, thus changing the amount of the legacies from $7,000 to $11,000. In another bequest the words “the use of” have been interlined, though the change is not really material. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crossman v. . CrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Lovell v. . QuitmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Wolf v. BollingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Jackson ex dem. Howard v. HollowayNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  5. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of PennimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Hesterberg v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908
  4. In re Wilcox's WillNew York Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API