Legal Opinion

Shuttlesworth v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1962No. 6 Div. 901Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

Both parties have moved for rehearing. The City’s motion for rehearing was filed one day late and cannot be considered.

Shuttlesworth, on his part, argues that the form of the request should have been treated alternatively as a petition for writ of error coram nobis.

An appeal in habeas corpus can be alternatively treated by the Supreme Court or this court as an application for leave to proceed for coram nobis in a trial court. This was the mode of entry in Johnson v. Williams, 244 Ala. 391, 13 So.2d 683.

However, in view of the fact that appeal to this court (Shuttlesworth v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Allen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API