Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1982)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports

Decided January 26, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

REQUESTED BY: Senator Harold F. Sieck State Capitol Box 24 Lincoln, NE 68509

Dear Senator Sieck:

This is in response to your inquiry pertaining to whether the `ten percent surcharge' referred to throughout LB 818 is a `fine or penalty' within the meaning of ArticleVII, Section 5 of the Nebraska Constitution.

The `surcharge' is properly regarded as a `penalty' and subject to the provisions of Article VII, Section 5 of the Nebraska Constitution.

Courts are prone to defining the term `penalty' with reference to the particular situation under consideration. Nevertheless, in Nebraska at least, if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Miller v. KingsleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Abel v. ConoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. School District v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Graham v. KibbleNebraska Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API