Opinion No. (1982)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
REQUESTED BY: Senator Harold F. Sieck State Capitol Box 24 Lincoln, NE 68509
Dear Senator Sieck:
This is in response to your inquiry pertaining to whether the `ten percent surcharge' referred to throughout LB 818 is a `fine or penalty' within the meaning of ArticleVII, Section 5 of the Nebraska Constitution.
The `surcharge' is properly regarded as a `penalty' and subject to the provisions of Article VII, Section 5 of the Nebraska Constitution.
Courts are prone to defining the term `penalty' with reference to the particular situation under consideration. Nevertheless, in Nebraska at least, if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Miller v. KingsleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Abel v. ConoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- School District v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Graham v. KibbleNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.