Legal Opinion

Smeal v. Olson

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2001No. A-00-834PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sievers, Judge.

In this tort litigation, the original petition was timely filed, but against the wrong defendant, who was timely served. The amended petition which substituted the correct defendant was filed after the statute of limitations had run. And the new defendant was not served with process until after the 4-year statute of limitations and the 6-month grace period for service of process had both run. Therefore, the question is whether the amended petition can relate back to the timely-filed original petition so that the plaintiff can maintain this suit against the second defendant.

BACKG…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Malcolm Simmons and Doris Simmons v. Teresa D. Fenton and James L. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  3. Chlopek v. SchmallNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Malerbi v. Central Reserve Life of North America InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McLain v. OrtmeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smeal v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kotlarz v. Olson Bros., Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API