Legal Opinion

Hart v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 13, 2017No. CR-16-856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRita W. Gruber, Chief Judge

-1¶ This revocation ease has returned to us after correction and- supplementation of the record and rebriefing. Hart v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 130, 2017 WL 927603 (Hart I). As detailed in our opinion in Hart I, appellant’s probation was revoked in three cases after the circuit court found that he had violated all three conditions alleged in the State’s petition-to revoke: committed a drug offense; inexcusably failed to pay court-ordered financial obligations; and possessed a controlled substance, possessed drug paraphernalia, and tested positive for controlled substances on four occasions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. McClanahan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Whitmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Trina Honeycutt v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Straub v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API