Alabama Power Co. v. Bryant
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing.'
FOSTER, J.
In a most respectful way counsel for appellant have earnestly urged a reconsideration of our statement that the use of appliances and methods in general use by other well-regulated enterprises of the same sort is not a test of due care, in that, we thereby depart from the principle of the following cases: Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Allen’s Adm’r, 78 Ala. 494; Georgia Pac. Ry. Co. v. Propst, 83 Ala. 526, 3 So. 764; Richmond & D. R. Co. v. Jones, 92 Ala. 218, 9 So. 276; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Hall, 87 Ala. 708, 6 So. 277, 4 L. R. A. 710, 13 Am. St. Rep. 84;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Allen's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.