Legal Opinion

State v. Bram

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 13, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, J.S.C.

The Appellate Division held, in State in the Interest of W.M., 237 N.J.Super. 111, 567 A.2d 217 (App.Div.1989), that “the mere conviction under N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 for the ‘ordinary’ crime of conspiracy does not render a person subject to the mandatory penalties of the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act, even if the object of that conspiracy constitutes a Chapter 35 offense.” Id. at 118, 567 A.2d 217. This motion presents the related *202question of whether the mandatory penalties authorized by the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act are applicable to adjudications under a charge of complicity…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. State v. ValentinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. State v. ProvenzanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D.A.C. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API