Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Carhart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PETITION EOR. QUO WARRANTO. As to the objection that the writ of quo warranto can only be brought on the relation of the Attorney General, and not on the relation of .any other person, we submit: That the amendment of the law by Sec. 525, of the Code, was merely the adoption of the- English statute of-9 Anne, ch. 20. ‘The Code proceeding is only the quo xoarranto, of the common law, codified, and it does not lie in the Code to impair the jurisdiction of this court, by…

Read the full summary

PETITION EOR. QUO WARRANTO. As to the objection that the writ of quo warranto can only be brought on the relation of the Attorney General, and not on the relation of .any other person, we submit: That the amendment of the law by Sec. 525, of the Code, was merely the adoption of the- English statute of-9 Anne, ch. 20. ‘The Code proceeding is only the quo xoarranto, of the common law, codified, and it does not lie in the Code to impair the jurisdiction of this court, by prescribing new forms, though the Code or any other statute, may prescribe the manner of proceeding in any of the courts.…

1Opinion of the CourtMcClure, C. J.

The only question presented, by this case, is, whether a quo warranto will issue on the relation of a private person ? ,It was held, in the State vs. Ashley, 1 Ark., 279; in Caldwell vs. Bell & Graham, 6 Ark., 227, and the State vs. Williams, that the writ of quo ivarranto wquld only issue on the relation . of the Attorney General, in the name of the State, in cases where the whole community are interested, and would not be granted at the instance of an individual for the determination of a private right.

The counsel for the appellant ask: “ Will any one say that the jurisdiction of this court…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Washington County Election CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. State ex inf. Crow v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Cherry v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones v. CarradineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API