Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Longino

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1933No. 9289PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. It is true that a court of equity has jurisdiction, in a proper case, to enjoin a suit in the municipal court of Atlanta; and if it had appeared that the judgment granting the application of Jennings to be ap*599pointed administrator of the estate of Liliie Flinn had been procured by fraud, then the court should have overruled the demurrer and should have set aside the judgment appointing Jennings administrator. Conceding that the judgment of the court of ordinary of Fulton County, vacating…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Donovan v. MajorIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Executors of Adams v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  3. Gantt v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Rudulph v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Mortgage & Acceptance Corp. v. BroadwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Insurance v. HankersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Goode v. TuggleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Payne v. Home Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Jones v. GannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Jennings v. LonginoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API