Legal Opinion

Leeuwenburg v. Waterway Investment Ltd. Partnership

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 1994No. 935SC524PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is to the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). We agree with the trial court that the present action is precluded by plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the administrative remedies provided by CAMA to seek review of the permit decision. Accordingly, we affirm the order dismissing this action.

*543When the record shows that there is no basis for declaratory relief, or the complaint does not allege an actual, genuine existing controversy, a motion for dismissal under G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6) will be granted.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Gaston Board of Realtors, Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Huang v. North Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Environmental Management Commission v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Elmore v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Bryant v. HogarthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Vanwijk v. Professional Nursing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API