Barrett v. W. S. Goff Co.

MAUCK, PJ. '

The petition so stricken stated no cause of. action. It did plead that the- defendant had “wrongfully” brought certain actions that resulted in a cloud on property in which the plaintiff had an interest. The petition did not state any acts, however, that made the institution of such suits wrongful. The petition was clearly insufficient. Leave was given the plaintiff to *324amend but the plaintiff refused to exercise the right. Judgment followed. The court, however, in striking the petition from the files apparently did so on the ground, inter alia, that the petition was frivolous and…