Legal Opinion
Szilagyi v. North Florida Hotel Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 22, 1992No. 91-4105PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
Based on our thorough review of the record and the decisions cited in Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing or Clarification, we find no basis for rehearing. However, because Appellants alleged that the four decisions cited in the motion “are directly on point and require that a new trial be ordered in this case,” we believe it will be useful to clarify the basis of our per curiam affirmance 606 So.2d 1170, of the final judgment in favor of Appellee and of the denial of Appellant’s motion for a new trial.
This cause arose from injuries allegedly sustained by…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- DeJesus v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Seaboard Coastline R. Co. v. AddisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Burns v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Bohannon v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Berenson v. Southern Baptist HospitalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- GOLDEN SHORELINE LTD. PTNRSHP. v. McGowanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001