Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Jenkins

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 16, 1977No. Civ. 1225PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Judge.

This is a divorce case.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the wife’s motion for a continuance. The basis of the continuance motion was that no court reporter was present to transcribe the testimony. We find the trial court did not err and affirm.

The controlling statute, as conceded by all parties, is Act No. 25, Acts of Alabama, Second Special Session 1971, and in pertinent part is as follows:

“The judge shall secure the services of a competent reporter to attend the sessions of the court and report all equity cases tried when request in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alabama Industrial Bank v. State Ex Rel. C. E. AvingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Adams v. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Shaw v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Adkins v. AdkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glass v. GlassCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API