Legal Opinion

Cole v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 7, 1933No. 13,174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Fred H. Cole, Sr., Alfred Itten and M. I. Stebbins, called herein the defendants, were found guilty of violating the banking laws and were sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary. They seek a reversal of the sentence.

Section 40, page 127, Session Laws of 1913, being section 2676 of the Compiled Laws, and section 85 of said act, being section 2740, Compiled Laws, as amended by Session Laws of 1927, page 207, make it a crime for any officer, director or employee of a bank to receive, or to assent to the reception of, a deposit of money or other valuable thing by the bank, with knowledge of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Denver & R. G. R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Clare v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  3. Harding v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Italia America Shipping Corp. v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Robertson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Cole v. Van HornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Woolsey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Woolsey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  5. Woolsey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API