Legal Opinion

Austin v. Snider

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1902No. 2077PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County.

1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.

December, 1892, appellant, as devisee of Eose [Rinehart, was entitled by the judgment of the district court to the possession, jointly with Geo. W. Snider, of Manitou grand caverns, together with the payment *177of a certain sum from Leddy, receiver, one-half of the proceeds from the exhibition thereof. On said date Snide;* filed his complaint in said district court against appellant as such devisee, and Charles Rinehart in his own right, and as administrator of said Rose Rinehart, and said Leddy as such receiver, and obtained an injunction restraining appellant and Charles Rinehart from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. BurrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Wason v. FrankColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Best v. Rocky Mountain National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. Denver Jobbers Ass'n v. RumseyColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Denver Jobbers Ass'n v. RumseyColorado Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API