Legal Opinion

Deoria v. State Athletic Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 2008No. 1266 C.D. 2008, 1391 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

In these cross appeals, James Deoria (Deoria) and Harry Joe Yorgey (Yorgey) appeal from an order of the State Athletic Commission (Commission), which modified the terms of the parties’ contract. We vacate.

This case involves a contract dispute between a professional boxer, Yorgey, and his manager, Deoria, both of whom are licensed by the Commission. On February 9, 2006, Yorgey and Deoria entered into a three-year boxer-manager contract, which was submitted to and approved by the Commission pursuant to' Section 1104 of the Boxing Act, 5 Pa.C.S. § 1104, and Section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., Zinc Smelting DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. In re Incorporation of The Borough of Valley-HiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. DeMarco v. Department of HealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Terry v. State Athletic CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deoria v. State Athletic CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API