Legal Opinion

(PC) Nuno v. Eslick

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 12, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00769Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GUILLERMO NUNO, No. 1:21-cv-00769-NODJ-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY THE 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 D. ESLICK, et al. (ECF No. 75) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order, filed 20 December 4, 2023. (ECF No. 75.) Defendants filed a response on December 11, 2023. (ECF 21 No. 76.) Although the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Jackson v. Laureate, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1999
  3. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API