Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 21, 1989No. 89-772PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals three judgments and sentences, citing sentencing errors which the state concedes. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

The sentences imposed are erroneous in the following respects. The written judgments and sentences fail to conform to the oral pronouncements of sentence. See Sandstrom v. State, 390 So.2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Further, the orally pronounced sentences are improper for several reasons: (1) They are violative of the principles set forth in Calhoun v. State, 522 So.2d 509 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), Lanier v. State, 504 So.2d 501 (Fla. 1st DCA…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Calhoun v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Lanier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Kline v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API