Legal Opinion

Crider Bros. Commission Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1930No. 8450PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

The only controlling issue presented in this appeal is whether the appellant was a personal service corporation for the years 19.18, 1919, 1920, and 1921. The Board of Tax Appeals affirmed the ruling of the Commissioner, deciding, upon redetermination, that there were deficiencies of tax for 1918 of $6,069.57, for 1919, of $7,919.01, for 1920, of $418.21, and for 1921, of $3,953.43. Appellant sought and seeks to avoid these rulings and orders on the plea that it is a personal service corporation as defined in section 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hubbard-Ragsdale Co. v. DeanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1926
  2. Denver Live Stock Com'n Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Franciscus Realty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. FEEDERS'SUPPLY CO. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Metropolitan Business College v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gragg v. Cayuga Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Edward P. Allison Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Atlanta-Southern Dental College v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  4. Graham Flying Service v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  5. Gragg v. Cayuga Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API