Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Perkins

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1911No. 16,354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This is an action to enjoin the defendant from trespassing on the plaintiff’s land, and from cutting, destroying or removing any part of a hedge growing, as alleged, upon his premises and close to the boundary. The defendant prevailed, and the plaintiff appeals.

In 1879 John Chapman planted an Osage orange hedge for 160 rods along and but a few inches east of the western boundary of the land now owmed by the plaintiff, and from that time made no claim to the *61land west of his hedge. In 1889 Mr. Chapman’s son-in-law, Perkins, the defendant herein, purchased the land immediately west of Mr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arterburn v. BeardNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Baynes v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Guyer v. StrattonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  4. McAfee v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Blood v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Acosta v. GinglesSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  2. Laughlin v. FrancSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. Schnakenberg v. SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cutright v. SextonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McNamara v. GundersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API