National Electrical Manufacturers Ass'n v. United States Department of Energy
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentShedd, Circuit Judge
When viewed in context, the statute we are reviewing is clearly unambiguous, and the Department of Energy’s (“DOE”) final rule is contrary to the statute and Congress’s clear direction. Therefore, I would grant the petition, vacate the final rule, and remand the matter to DOE for action consistent with the law.
Nineteen years ago, Congress enacted the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (the “Act”), part of which directed DOE to prescribe energy conservation standards for small electric motors. See 42 U.S.C. § 6317(b). The Act defines “small electric motor” as “a NEMA1 general purpose alternating…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. MorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.