Legal Opinion

Brevig v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1896No. Nos. 9678-(278)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

Plaintiff claims damages from defendant in this action on the ground that, while a passenger on one of its railroad trains, he was by threats of bodily violence, to him made by one •of defendant’s servants, in charge of the train, and while the train was in motion, compelled to jump from the train, by reason of which he was run over, and one of his arms crushed under the wheels, so that it had to be amputated. On the trial a verdict was ordered for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals.

On the trial plaintiff testified that he and one Hanson left Minneapolis, May…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Janny v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Childers v. Southern Pacific Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Barrett v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Penas v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Golden v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Grahn v. I. G.N.R.R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API