United States v. Joseph Vanterpool
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted on two counts of selling heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174 after a trial before the Honorable Irving Ben Cooper and a jury.1 Concurrent sentences of five *698years inprisonment on each count were imposed.
Appellant’s principal argument on this appeal is that his pre-arraignment statement to an assistant United States attorney should not have been admitted into evidence because the warnings he was given were inadequate under the standards set forth in Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We hold…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Paul Salvatore ArmettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Joseph VanterpoolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
3Cited by62 opinions
- Raymond R. Fowle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- United States v. Robert Anthony LamiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- State v. MelvinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- United States v. Alphonse JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.