Kneeland v. Pennell
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of Hew York overruling demurrer to counterclaim. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
The plaintiffs sue upon a promissory note, claiming to recover the amount of its face and interest, less a small sum said to have been realized upon the sale of collateral. The defendant by way of answer sets up three counterclaims; one, apparently for damages for plaintiffs’ misconduct in executing or refusing to execute orders to buy and sell wheat, and two for damages for the conversion of certain collateral deposited with plaintiffs to cover defendant’s speculation in grain. It appears from the allegations of the counterclaims that, for some time prior to the making of the note in suit,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cass v. . HigenbotamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Harris v. . TumbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Ter Kuile v. MaralandNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Campbell v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wright v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914